Difference between revisions of "Design and Energy Harvesting research"

From Interaction Station Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 194: Line 194:
  
 
==Design-Art questioning==
 
==Design-Art questioning==
 +
 +
Can energy be designed? Or is meant behavior design for instance in Transformation Design, some behavior that spends less energy?
 +
Or is this subject only meant for "energy minimizing projects".
  
 
Design-Art is an area where many layers of meaning are playing a role:
 
Design-Art is an area where many layers of meaning are playing a role:
Line 204: Line 207:
 
*development
 
*development
 
*process
 
*process
 +
 
but also:
 
but also:
 
*trend
 
*trend
Line 218: Line 222:
 
Or is energy more like "a material", that is, likewise the material acquires its "playfulness" etcetera through design?
 
Or is energy more like "a material", that is, likewise the material acquires its "playfulness" etcetera through design?
  
But how leading is energy then in a design? Is energy a very special, or "just" a component?
+
Can design be considered "better" if it consumes less or no energy? Isn't that depending on other factors, like mass production?
 +
 
 +
Is energy consideration just following a societal trend?
 +
 
 +
If a certain design costs less energy, or in the limit no energy, then the energy factor is eliminated, which leads to a paradox? (Starting with energy as a part of design, the designer succeeded in minimizing the consumed energy, ergo this design leaves the domain of "energy".
 +
 
 +
But how leading is energy then in a design? Is energy a very special, or "just" a design component?
  
Can design be considered "better" if it consumes less or no energy? Isn't that depending on other factors, like mass production?
+
In prototyping, worrying about energy, is that spending your energy in the right way? The prototype being developed, isn't it for another specialist to deliberate the energy reduction?

Revision as of 15:43, 21 February 2022


This page is under construction!!! (mainly written in 2015...now it is 2022...reviewing....)

Intro

  • A research by Beam into the possibilities for WdKA students to add energy harvesting to their projects. The focus of this research is on how this field of Energy Harvesting can be openend up for WdKA students.
  • The next more difficult question is what can be the contribution of WdKA students to this field?

About Energy Harvesting

If your product becomes interactive in any way it needs energy. This energy is normally obtained from the mains (220V) or using batteries. In case of batteries, like laptops and cell phones, the device has to be recharged regularly.

Energy Harvesting means you replace these traditional sources by a way to generate the needed energy by the product you have designed yourself. This can be done by using the energy of the Sun in a solar cell, or wind energy by a generator or the muscle energy of the user by a dynamo.

Why is this nice?

  • Not wasting more fossil energy
  • Not or less dependent of Putin's oil, he might get angry and turn of your device, more general: independent of politicians, dictators, manipulators
  • You or your product use what you need, which is a good principle
  • You or your product could help other people becoming a little bit more independent, you could be an example for them
  • You get empowered, which means you can really even at a small scale make a difference in the energy and climate change debate.
  • you get conscious of energy domains, that means that even using "traditional" energy you will waste less

Pitfalls:

  • you think you can solve the energy problem: forget it!
  • using solar energy also warms up the Earth's atmosphere
  • many energy harvesting ideas are inefficient, using more resources for creating equipment than the energy that is saved
  • producing local energy on a small scale is always less efficient than production on a big scale
  • thinking that you can bypass commercial laws about making profit at the cost of others or at the cost of the resources of the Earth
  • thinking that you can "help" poor people in "poor" countries
  • suggesting solutions from one domain of energy to work for other domains of energy

Research Blog

In this blog the posts document the progress of the research. The research was not a lineair process. The subject of Energy Harvesting is complex and has lot's of details. This research was not only about knowledge gathering but also doing experiments ourselves.

  • (Transferred) Blog - (now in 2022 this is an old blog - 2015)
    • The blog posts are transferred from the Raspberry Pi to a normal Wordpress blog]
  • Former Blog on Raspberry Pi
    • sorry, due to the 2015 NASA App Challenge Weekend, the Raspberry Pi Server is not in service at the moment.

The research result is an energy harvesting game wearable: artistic research result

The resulting garment is shown at a presentation of wearables at the Kunst Fach Hochschule Bremen on the 28th of April 2015.

It is also presented at the E-textile Summercamp 2015: https://www.flickr.com/photos/contrechoc/albums/72157654769872643

All kind of early e-textile experiments: [1]

Powerpoints of a course "Energy Harvesting for Designers"

In the "Open AanbodWdKA" a course on this subject was given. Two powerpoints introduce the subject and the calculations:


Categories of Design Projects using Energy Harvesting

  • Commercial Projects
    • Designers are involved in projects which want to generate commercially exploitable amounts of energy
  • Social Projects
  • Projects creating Toys for awareness
    • Designers are creating interesting game situations for children to gain intuition into energy
  • Research Projects
    • research Designers are investigating possibilities of energy harvesting in clothing and devices and probing the social consequences

Energy Domains

  • Very low energy harvesting (Seeback effect, Peltier Element, Piezo energy)
    • With this kind of energy you can send a signal once in a while, like temperature, or opening a door by a wireless signal
  • Middle field, low energy (solar cells, dynamo's for human use)
    • In this domain you can charge your cell phones or smaller devices
  • High (higher) energy projects

Ways of Energy Harvesting

Calculations, Laws, Formula's

In order to be able to make your project work you need to calculate what energy you need. Then you have to choose from the possibilities avaialable which source will deliver that energy. Also you have to consider the circumstances. You can think the Sun will be able to deliver the energy , but if you will use your design product in Holland the Sun is not always available, so you need to consider alternatives. Power Law: P = V * I, power equals volt times current.

Energy Law : E = P * s, total energy is power times the number of seconds you apply this power.

Ohm's Law: V = I * R, Voltage equals Current times resistance.

Example: [2]

Proposed energy installations for the Interaction Stations

Investigated Gadgets

Investigating gadgets is done for hacking. Hacking means modifying an existing device for your projects purposes. In the case of energy harvesting this can save you a lot of time, because the designers of the gadgets already did the research. You have to choose the right gadget, hack it and you might have your project on it's own energy!

Beside that you have experimenting kits. In these kits, mainly solar cell experimenting kits, you can find examples of applying the energy of a solar cell. Most of the time, the design level of these kits is very low.

Some cheap gadgets analysed for this research:

  • Chinese dynamo light torch, very cheap, 1 euro
  • IKEA Ljusa, dynamo light torch, 4 euros
  • Chinese garden lamp, with a solar cell

comparing these gadgets:

Solar cell kits: [3]

  • 6 in 1 Educational Solar Kit
  • Velleman kit EDU 02
  • Conrad kit
  • SOLAR GENERATION KOSMOS

Some toys for children:

  • EnergyBugs: energy harvesting wearables for children:

http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2557225

  • Tribo-electric effect - Paper generators, working with Teflon:

Ivan Poupyrev and others. 2013

http://www.disneyresearch.com/project/paper-generators/

http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/132492/p29-villar.pdf

http://www.disneyresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/Project_PaperGenerators_uist2013_paper1.pdf

With this idea I made an "e-textile swatch": 2015 - http://etextile-summercamp.org/swatch-exchange/flash-knit/ The rubbing of the knitting on the plastic side, connected with an h-bridge chip, should make a led flash. It worked, sometimes. Later it didn't work...

Experiments with harvesting chips


LTC 3108: Peltier chip, this was a day of soldering with the microscope: https://www.flickr.com/photos/contrechoc/26813241038/in/album-72157664460566867/ a movie of this chip: https://www.flickr.com/photos/contrechoc/45852198565/in/album-72157664460566867/

Developments 2022

The start of this page was written in 2015. Now it is 2022.

  • In the domain of microcontrollers:

More and more microcontrollers and sensors are running at 3V instead of 5V. For microcontrollers this is a significant difference!

There are boards running for weeks at a coin cell battery, like the Sparkfun Edge. https://learn.sparkfun.com/tutorials/sparkfun-edge-hookup-guide/all

Many boards and sensors of Sparkfun are 3v. Boards and sensors of Adafruit run on both 3V and 5V.

Other boards on 3V: for instance the BBC Microbit. https://microbit.org


  • In 2022 many difficult to solder yourself chips have break out boards:

Sparkfun harvester breakout: https://www.sparkfun.com/products/9946

Thinking from another angle 2022

  • a display for a microcontroller which does not use energy (when not "changed").

Lately there are e-paper displays for microcontrollers. These display use energy when written to, but after that, the text or drawing remains on the display even if the battery is detached: https://www.flickr.com/photos/contrechoc/51678195121/in/dateposted/ e-paper display, for instance: https://www.otronic.nl/a-65504280/displays/1-54inch-e-ink-display-spi/

When one starts making wooden battery holders, immediately the "design" component becomes obvious, product design, materials. The wood has a shape - different from the "cold" electronic, technical shape. Also the wood has "character". The wood resists. Your finger is hurt by a saw going the wrong way...:-). Of course, something like a transistor cannot be made from wood, nor chips.

Some of my energy related or maybe related projects

"Doing it yourself" - getting lost in details, making errors, failures, getting of track, learning new things, experimenting.

A 2017 dress made of Yaki sushi nori: https://www.flickr.com/photos/contrechoc/albums/72157683058750910, shown during the E-textile summer camp 2017. Of course this project was half jokingly critical: the idea to grow your dress, wear it, eat it, and so on. The nori was acting as a humidity sensor: if it rained, the stuff gets smelly.

A 2019 project using wind-energy (in a classical sense): interactivity and kites: https://airlaboart.wordpress.com/ resulting in an object (kite) being able to be unhappy, because of being able to "dream" data from other objects. Being unhappy because of dreaming to be somebody else then you are.

Design-Art questioning

Can energy be designed? Or is meant behavior design for instance in Transformation Design, some behavior that spends less energy? Or is this subject only meant for "energy minimizing projects".

Design-Art is an area where many layers of meaning are playing a role:

not only:

  • shape-form
  • materials
  • presentation
  • context
  • development
  • process

but also:

  • trend
  • hype
  • playfulness
  • humor
  • sarcasm
  • activism
  • critical approach

"Energy" is not in itself a design component, nor a material. How is "energy" fitting in - with these advanced layers of design?

Or is energy more like "a material", that is, likewise the material acquires its "playfulness" etcetera through design?

Can design be considered "better" if it consumes less or no energy? Isn't that depending on other factors, like mass production?

Is energy consideration just following a societal trend?

If a certain design costs less energy, or in the limit no energy, then the energy factor is eliminated, which leads to a paradox? (Starting with energy as a part of design, the designer succeeded in minimizing the consumed energy, ergo this design leaves the domain of "energy".

But how leading is energy then in a design? Is energy a very special, or "just" a design component?

In prototyping, worrying about energy, is that spending your energy in the right way? The prototype being developed, isn't it for another specialist to deliberate the energy reduction?